The Myth Of Unlearning
A Misstep In Modern Learning And Development
In recent years, the term “unlearning” has been bandied about in Learning and Development circles with a fervour that matches the rapid pace of change we witness in our industries. It’s touted as a necessary process to erase outdated knowledge before new learning occurs. But, it’s crucial to discern the accurate from the fanciful to uphold the integrity and efficacy of our field. This brings us to debunk the concept of unlearning, which, upon closer examination, does not align with the established theories and practices in learning science. In short, it makes no sense.
Misunderstanding How Learning Works
The notion of unlearning seems to stem from a misconception about how the human brain operates. It suggests a need to delete old information to make room for the new, contrary to the well-established cognitive psychology theories. Our brains build upon existing knowledge, creating a rich tapestry of interconnected concepts that aid in deeper understanding and application. We are complex organic machines, not easily managed flash storage.
The Absence of a Factual Basis
There isn’t substantial scientific backing to the claim that unlearning is a requisite step in the learning process. The term lacks a clear definition and empirical support in academic literature, making it a dubious concept that threatens to mislead L&D practitioners.
Sadly, it’s all too common to see the importance of this overlooked. It is still worryingly acceptable in our field to guess, slap a name on it, and say hey, trust me. Perhaps this is why we still struggle to be taken seriously by many organisations… just saying.
The Detriment to Professional Standards
By promoting the idea of unlearning, we risk diluting the standards of our profession, such as they are. It diverts our focus from evidence-based practices and may lead to allocating resources towards unproductive endeavours. The time and energy spent attempting to unlearn could be redirected towards more proven, impactful learning strategies.
A Veil Over Real Solutions
The spotlight on unlearning can overshadow the real solutions to the challenges of outdated or incorrect knowledge. Strategies such as corrective feedback, and continuous learning are time-tested, effective approaches to updating our knowledge and skills. Sadly their names just aren’t as slap you in the face exciting as unlearning… apparently.
The Promise of Lifelong Learning
Instead of chasing the elusive and ill-defined process of unlearning, let’s refocus our energies on fostering a culture of continuous learning. Lifelong learning is a robust, evidence-based approach that accommodates the ever-evolving nature of knowledge and skills in the 21st century.
The concept of unlearning is not only scientifically unfounded but potentially damaging to the reputation and effectiveness of our L&D profession. We must consider well-researched, evidence-informed practices and steer our discourse away from trendy yet baseless notions. Through a steadfast commitment to what truly drives learning, we can elevate our practice and make meaningful contributions to individual and organisational success. Or, we could just jump on yes another buzzword and ride it into the sunset. I guess it‘s up to you.